The Female Problem
Women are polygynous, meaning they will aim to reproduce with the top men. 100% of women will happily confine themselves to the top 40%, 20%, 5%, whatever they can get away with. This would mean that the majority of women would be single mothers. If there are enough resources for them, and no social restraints, they will happily pursue this course. The resources could be provided by the state, by the fathers (if wealth inequality was high), or by themselves. For example, gorillas and lions are able to be polygynous because gorillas just eat leaves and female lions are good hunters.
Polygyny means that most males don’t reproduce. This can lead to mass social unrest and even the collapse of civilization, since males are typically the ones who build and maintain technology and infrastructure. This is not a concern for women, they do not think about these matters. Women are not very good at ‘tribal management’. To be reproductively successful, males need the group to be strong and cohesive, but females do not. If the group is defeated, the females will reproduce anyway.
Women are almost exclusively designed for child-birthing and child-rearing. They play dolls when they are young. They mature before boys so that older men can reproduce with them. They produce breast milk. They are highly attuned to the cry and the needs of babies. They are good at multi-tasking so they can keep an eye on children. They have more oxytocin and have higher empathy than men. Their periods are painful so they are encouraged to leave men who are unwilling or unable to get them pregnant.
Women have low variability in intelligence, behavioural traits and physical traits. Men are the testing ground for genes. 68% of people have an IQ between 85 and 115. For women, it is probably 80%. There is not a single women that has an IQ above 135. I am adamant about this. The only ones who do are severely autistic women, and they don’t count because they are basically men.
Any attempt to control women is frightening to them because the next step might mean an end to polygyny. Women support abortion because they hate the thought that they might be forced to have a child from a man not in the top 10%. Women are contrarian in order to provoke socially dominant males, believing they can manage their anger by seducing them. One way that evolution discouraged polygyny was by the synchronization of female menstruation. A dominant male would be unlikely to fertilize all females in the few days of the month when they actually have a sex drive. Pair bonding is another way, but these methods only work in small tribes. If a female messages you on Tinder, there is a good chance she is ovulating and if you don’t secure a date quickly you will have to wait until the next cycle.
Women enjoy travelling more than men. This is because hunter-gatherer men bought, courted or abducted women from neighbouring tribes. Women are highly conformist and adapt to different cultures better and learn new languages faster. Women buy more pets and more plants, an easy way to satisfy their nurturing instinct. Boats and trucks are generally female because they carry people - just like pregnant women.
We can tell that women are solely designed for child-rearing because of what they are good at, but also because of what they are not good at. We know from studies that women are less logical, and we also know from experience that women are not good at cooking. Its too much pressure, or something. They do not even like cooking, only baking.
And of course, they are not good at sports. This is because they are weaker, right? Well, partly. Have a look at all the sports that segregate women:
Soccer
Rugby
Shooting
Lawn bowls
Car racing
Chess (not a sport I guess)
The last four sports don’t have much to do with strength or speed, and yet men dominate women just as easily. Men have better vision, coordination, muscle memory, spatial ability, intelligence, competitive motivation etc etc.
If you watch jigsaw puzzle world championships on YouTube, its completely dominated by female contestants. Its like 80% women at least. I didn’t realise women liked puzzles so much. But the world champion is a man.
Men are terrible at child-rearing. They seem to have very little interest in kids, generally speaking. Even relatively nice people, like Elon Musk, would rather shitpost on twitter than spend time with their kids. But that’s not as serious an issue as female polygyny, which is the cause for below-replacement level birth rates in all western countries.
Its not actually complicated to solve the issue. Anyone not married by 24 spends 3 years in prison. Anyone married for 2 years without having a kid spends 3 years in prison. And then just give large tax breaks for every extra child. Its very simple, its just difficult to enact as laws because liberals have too much power and influence.




Love how you're willing to take big risks and explore novelty, and think critically, without evident concern for social repercussions
Considering the difficulties I had at 25 finding work, if this were already law I think I’d have just taken the free bed ‘n breakfast. Better I get the handouts and a no-strings 3-year runway to study than a petty drug dealer as is currently common. Are you sure that policy is sufficient for the stated effect?